This article by Hollis originally appeared in ClickZ on August 28, 2007.
Though there are several shades of definition, ad network transparency is a network’s disclosure of the sites it represents. Ad networks are increasingly claiming transparency. Some even use transparency as a value proposition cornerstone. Why is this occurring, what do the ad networks have to say on the topic of transparency, and how might this affect media strategy?
Why Transparency Now?
A number of factors are contributing to the shift to ad network transparency. There’s pressure from large advertisers. Several suffered black eyes when anti-spyware investigations earlier this year revealed brand-name ads placed on inappropriate sites or adjacent to inappropriate content. Some viewed that lack of transparency as a liability. Ad network nondisclosure was painted as nefarious and disreputable. No company wants to be associated with these types of descriptions, particularly in this easily manipulated Web 2.0 era of the reputation economy.
Media buyer awareness and education plays a part in the shift. The media buyer views transparency as another campaign aspect she can control, which then causes her to seek it out. This, in turn, creates more demand. If the network wants the sale, it must offer transparency to remain competitive.
Competitive forces are also an influence, especially after media monster Google announced transparency in performance metrics reporting. These days, everyone’s trying to catch up with Google.
Ad Network Claims
Pose the transparency question to an ad network now and you’re almost certain to get an affirmative answer — with a few exceptions. Probe a little further, however, and you’ll see not all their answers are the same.
Some networks, like Interclick, and contextual networks, like Google’s Content Network, Quigo, take an absolute stance on transparency. Others, like Tribal Fusion, Tacoda, and Collective Media, emphasize the quality content of their network and assert transparency, but there seem to be some gray areas. These networks may conceal a small number of publishers, only disclose their list of sites upon request, or provide limited reporting. Still others, such as Burst Media, offer both. Burst Media’s Burst Direct is a blind network, while the Burst Network is transparent.
The most noticeable shift comes from such ad networks as Advertising.com and ValueClick Media. In times past, they wore their blind network status with pride. Now they’re trying to spin transparency into their capabilities. They talk about the importance or degree of transparency being related to the kind of advertiser and the campaign objective, with brand advertisers more concerned about transparency than those seeking direct response objectives. For direct response advertisers, these networks claim, it’s about reach, efficiency, and volume, and that advertisers must entrust trafficking decisions to the network to ensure performance and quality metrics are achieved.
What’s a media buyer to believe?
Transparency in Strategy
If transparency is important to the ad strategy, the media buyer must do her homework. It’s not good enough to take a network’s word on its transparency. Ask how that network defines its transparency: To what degree is the network transparent? If there are any blind sites, how might they wind up (or not) in a transparent buy? How much can the buyer control where her ads might be placed, and how does optimization occur within the transparent buy? Does reporting drill down to the site-specific level?
Such reporting can inform a campaign. If smaller but highly targeted long-tail sites prove to drive campaign response, the buyer can seek out similar sites, all of which may be at potentially lower CPMs than a broad network buy. Such responses can also help inform alternatively targeted campaigns such as behavioral or contextual.
Transparency also prevents the buyer from duplicating a buy across the same property through two different networks. This could be viewed as good for the ad networks as it opens a door to more than one network.
Is transparency all about buying smarter, protecting the brand, and having a better understanding of what works or doesn’t for your client? I’d love to hear your opinion.
Web Ad.vantage is a full-service online marketing company with core competencies in search engine optimizatiom, PPC Campaign Management and online media buying. Visit our Internet Marketing Services section to learn more about our full range of services.
WebAdvantage.net encourages the reprinting of our marketing tips and articles. Before doing so, however, please contact us at for permission to do so. The company bio located above is required to accompany any reprint. Thank you in advance for your professional courtesy.
Pragmatic, professional advice with no hidden agenda.
![]()
Internet Business Forum
Find out more hereGoogle Knol: The First Real Challenge to Wikipedia?
In the search landscape, Wikipedia has been dominating first page search results on practically any subject for years, and continues to be one of the most authoritative “go to” sites for research and quick fact checking. However, the collective... read more
Solutions for Yahoo (Besides Microsoft’s Money)
This article by Hollis originally appeared in ClickZ on February 12, 2008. Last week, I dealt with the sad occurrence of my father-in-law’s passing. The funeral brought together people from throughout the country because in addition to his... read more
Can User-Selected Advertising Improve Response Rates?
This article by Hollis originally appeared in ClickZ on January 29, 2008. We’re all familiar with ad-supported content models, and even ad-motivated action models (remember those ghastly surf-for-points companies during the dot-com boom... read more















back to top
Subscribe to our blog RSS



