<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Direct Branding: The Best of Both Worlds?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webadvantage.net/webadblog/direct-branding-the-best-of-both-worlds-1383/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webadvantage.net/webadblog/direct-branding-the-best-of-both-worlds-1383</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BT</title>
		<link>http://www.webadvantage.net/webadblog/direct-branding-the-best-of-both-worlds-1383/comment-page-1#comment-12697</link>
		<dc:creator>BT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webadvantage.net/webadblog/?p=1383#comment-12697</guid>
		<description>Direct response marketing and brand image advertising are different. From a creative standpoint, there is no synergy when you try to find a &quot;happy medium.&quot; When both functions are allowed to do their jobs unhampered by the constraints of the other, you have a better outcome.

My observation is that the &quot;direct branding&quot; compromise was conceived by brand advertisers who want to &quot;own&quot; direct without having to really understand it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Direct response marketing and brand image advertising are different. From a creative standpoint, there is no synergy when you try to find a &#8220;happy medium.&#8221; When both functions are allowed to do their jobs unhampered by the constraints of the other, you have a better outcome.</p>
<p>My observation is that the &#8220;direct branding&#8221; compromise was conceived by brand advertisers who want to &#8220;own&#8221; direct without having to really understand it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
